Most community development projects are design-ed and delivered using a combination of partici-patory techniques to uncover local problems, re-source constraints, deficiencies and unmet basic needs. While these approaches encourage partici-pation, they often fail to sustain the community’s ‘buy-in’ after the implementing organisation with-draws.
It has generally been observed that most government community development and support agencies use these approaches to search for and identify com-munity problems. They generate volumes of data that provide great detail on the origins and consequences of local needs and resource constraints.
Consequently, plans which are laid out by them to address the problems are then developed as ‘interventions’. But at the end of implementing such plans, local people who identify themselves in a certain way, still look at themselves as a community full of problems and needs. Why is this so?
The problem lies in the approach itself. When a community development plan or project is framed as an ‘intervention’, it entrenches a sense of dependency in the community that the agency or agent must then work to overcome. And that being the case, it reinforces an ‘identity’ that thiers is a ‘problematical’ com-munity needing ‘intervention’ and as such, has disempowering effects because it suggests they’ve failed.
These unintended consequences illustrate the importance of shifting away from a problem-that-needs-intervention oriented method toward processes that instead build on community achievements, existing strengths and local skills. What’s needed instead is an approach that delivers self-empowerment building upon self-reliance.
Development organisations need better methods for engaging local people, one which they can employ to help communities create a shared vision of an equitable and sustainable future and then move them toward locally-initiated self-managed undertakings. Such methods need to be comple-mented through capacity-building initiatives at the community level so that its members are able to measure progress themselves toward their vision and to modify their strategies as local circumstances change.
Faith in Families believes that focusing on community strengths has the greatest potential to advance sustainable development at the local community level – one which develops sustainable livelihoods that build on local strengths by identifying and reinforcing adaptive strategies that local people often de-velop to maintain their livelihoods in circumstances they find themselves deal-ing with.
This kind of thinking turns the ‘problem-solving’ approach on its head because it focuses on a community’s achievements rather than its problems instead. It seeks to go beyond ’identity’ by fostering inspiration at the grass-roots level.
It is a strategy for purposeful change and one that identifies the best of “what is” to pursue aspirations and possibilities of “what could be.” It is a co-operative search for strengths, passions and life-giving forces that are found within every local community – factors that are what hold the potential for inspired, positive change. This strategy employs a new approach for collaborative inquiry based on face-to-face discussions and affirmative questioning, and one that collects and celebrates the ‘good news’ stories of about the community that eventually can be published and disseminated to the rest of the world.
SOMETHING MUCH BETTER
From those jumping points, local people can then use their understanding of “the best of what is” to construct a vision of what their community might be if they identify their strengths, then improve or intensify them. They achieve this goal by creating provocative propositions that challenge themselves to move ahead by understanding and building upon their current achievements even if it’s just taking one step at a time..
Provocative propositions that are generated by local community members themselves which are inclusive rather than excluding are realistic aspirations – they reflect collective community thinking that defines their own problemsneeds and solutions. Because it emphasizes the importance of local knowledge and not some eextaneous intervention, they empower members of a community to reach for something much better than what they have, but basing it on their understanding of what gives them life now.
This is the fundamental approach which Faith in Families employs for local com-munity development projects it involves itself in.



Visit Site
This is the total number of vi-sits people have made to indi-vidual published web pages on this site as of a week ago.




Hi! I came across your webpage while i was on Google searching for a few recent Twitter trends to see what’s been hot lately. Hung around a bit to check things out and browse a number of your articles… insightful stuff. I’ll be back around once again later on for sure.
Communities are much like grandparents where the angle of approach is foremost when weighing and considering things that affect their extended family. I agree with your approach.
This article and the last few that precede it reminds me of a young man who was once the chief financial officer of a flagship mass rail transit system infratructure project here in the Philippines in the mid-1990s called Metro Rail. He was instrumental in putting together a comprehensive plan to relocate over 5,000 indigent families who were squatting on a large piece of land the Philippine government reserved for the system’s multi-level underground depot. It was a huge and complicated undertaking. At that time, I was advising the World Bank on poverty issues in the country and that plan he wrote was brought to my attention for impact assessment. I remember reading that well-written document and was very impressed at how deeply cognizant he was of the human aspect and how he creatively imputed Christian-based principles to fashion an innovative structure which also employed project-related funds to empower those 5,000 familes with dignity and economic opportunities and still not violate nor impair any of the project lenders’ strict covenants on use of project-related funds. As a result of that plan which was incidentally approved and implemented smoothly, many of the children of those families were also given educational opportunities and subsidies not available to them had they stayed on living on land they didn’t own. As usual, the local politicians took all of the credit for the outcomes even if they really had nothing to do with it. I had an opportunity to ask him about this particular matter guessing only that it could be a bitter disappointment. But what he said instead, in a soft voice and with a gentle smile, struck me then as it does today, ‘where your treasure lies, there you heart is also’. I cannot forget this reply for you see, it is also written in the Holy Bible. I now know that a Power much higher than all of us guided him. Today, all those people he quietly helped are blessed as a result. Many of them still probably don’t even know who he is. I understand he migrated to New Zealand or Australia some years later. I suspect this must be the same person who wrote this article. If it is, please extend to him my heart-felt thanks. — Father Mariano de la Paz S.J.
Hi! Rev. Mariano. I certainly remember you. Yes, it was I who wrote it. I see you’re still with Caritas. I now reside in New Zealand. Thanks for remembering me — Karl Quirino (FIF Co-Founder).
Brilliant! Just absolutely brilliant!
If any of you guys decide to stand up for office in the next election, you’ve got my vote.
I do a lot of local community work here in the UK and must say this is an innovative yet extraordinarily realistic approach. Forget the metrics that all bureaucrats love tossing around and all the senseless reports they churn out to please politicians. You can’t measure imagination with that, can you? People are people. That is what’s at the heart of any successful outcome for a community. Three cheers and 5 Stars I say!
You blokes are right spot on the dot. I agree 100% that our local communities have problems and that intervention isn’t the best approach. It’s counter-productive. counter-intuitive and just plain stupid. There are better uses for tax money that’s thrown in every year by government to try and figure out a better way to produce results. You fellows ought to give them a workshop on how to go about doing it.
I’m a bit embarrased to say this, but you leave me no choice other than to admit and say that I’m going to borrow a lot of the ideas your organisation has exposed in this wonderful article. Very insightful and extremely proactive in its approach towards community development.
There appears to be a common thread between this article and the previous six ones beginning with the one titled Agents of Change. They all contain very good ideas and when all parts are read as a whole, point to some powerful yet simple arguments. This is the kind of thinking that gets things done.
Excellent article. It contains many seminal ideas in its approach. Whoever wrote it knows what he or she is talking about.